skip to Main Content

2022. no 2. Roman Pochekaev

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/kio.2022.2.84-98 Скачать статью

Safeguards for civil interests in the diplomatic correspondence of Crimean khans
(on a base of yarlighs given to monarchs of Russian and Polish-Lithuanian states)

Roman Pochekaev

(National Research University Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg;
“The Great Altay” Scientific Educational Center of altaistics and turkology)

Abstract. The article is an analysis of legal safeguards for civil interests in the foreign policy acts of the Crimean Khanate of 16th–18th cc. The source base for research includes yarlighs sent by khans from Giray dynasty to rulers of Moscow State and Kingdom of Poland-Lithuania. Author paid attention to regulations related to protection of trade between these states and legal safeguards for merchants and their property. Such safeguards includes as general rules of free trade with payment minimal taxes and duties as well as rights of traders to go to law in case of breach of their interests and encroachments on their money, property, etc. Khans pledged themselves to restore their rights by return of unlawful taxes and duties and to call offenders to account although there were high officials. Sometimes regulations in yarlighs concerned personal private interests of khans and sometimes there were decisions on the property of died persons. Some regulations in this field were inherited by Girays from khans of the Golden Horde, but we could suppose that substantial part of such rules could be adopted from reciprocal acts of Russian and Polish-Lithuanian monarchs. At the same time we should not consider that such safeguards were determined by protection of interests of Crimean merchants: in most cases there was care of khans’ treasury and more than one such safeguards were instruments to reach diplomatic and political goals in the relations with Moscow or Krakow.

Keywords: Crimean Khanate, yarlighs of khans, Moscow State, Polish-Lithuanian Kingdom, international trade, civil relations, legal safeguards.

For citation: Pochekaev R.Yu. Safeguards for civil interests in the diplomatic correspondence of Crimean khans (on the base of yarlighs given to monarchs of Russia and Polish-Lithuanian states). Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie=Crimean Historical Review. 2022, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 84–98. DOI: 10.22378/kio.2022.2.84-98 (In Russian)

REFERENCES

  1. Abduzhemilev R. Yarlyki Krymskogo khanstva [Yarlighs of the Crimean Khanate]. Krymskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie [Crimean Historical Review], 2016, no. 2, pp. 208–227.
  2.  Arslanov A.M. Torgovtsy – ortaki v Zolotoy Orde v XIII–XIV vv.  Vest-nik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv. 2012, no. 4, pp. 157–160. 
  3. Sal’e M.A. (transl.). Babur-name. Tashkent: Glavnaya redaktsiya entsiklopediy [Chief edition of encyclopedias], 1992. 464 p. (In Russian)
  4. Vernadskiy G.V. O sostave Velikoy Yasy Chingis-khana [On the scope of the great Yasa of Chingis Khan]. In: Vernadskiy G.V. Istoriya prava. St. PEtersburg: Lan’ Publ., 1999, pp. 111–148. (In Russian)
  5. Veselovskiy N. Zaumorshchina [Escheat]. In: Brokgauz F.A. and Efron I.A. (publ.). Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Encyclopedia]. St. Petersburg: Typolithography of I.A. Efron, 1894, p. 333. (In Russian)
  6. Grigor’ev A.P., Grigor’ev V.P. Kollektsiya zolotoordynskikh dokumentov XIV veka iz Venetsii: Istochnikovedcheskoye issledovanie [Collection of Golden Horde documents of the 14th century from Venice: Source study]. St Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2002. 276 p. (In Russian)
  7. Kalan E. Ulus Dzhuchi (Zolotaya Orda) i strany Vostoka: torgovo-ekonomicheskie vzaimootnosheniya vo vtoroy polovine XIII–XIV vv. [Jochi Ulus (Golden Horde) and states of the Orient: trade-economic relations at the second half of 13th–14th cc.]. Kazan: “Yaz” Publ., 2012. 156 p. (In Russian)
  8. Kobeko D. Maytamal. Zapiski Vostochnogo otdeleniya Imperatorskogo Russkogo arkheologicheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Oriental branch of the Imperial Russian Archeological Society], 1887, vol. 2, pp. 270–272. (In Russian)
  9. Muhammad ibn Hindushah Nakhchivani. Dastur al-katib fi ta‘yin al-maratib (Rukovodstvo dlya pisca pri opredelenii stepeney) [A Scribe’s Guide to Determining Degrees]. Crit. texst, intr. and indexby A.A. Alizade. Vol. II. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. 70+524 p. (In Persian)
  10. Karpov G.F. (ed.). Pamyatniki diplomaticheskikh snosheniy Moskovskogo gosudarstva s aziatskimi narodami: Krymom, Kazan’yu, Nogaytsami i Turtsiey, za vremya Velikikh knyazey Ioanna III i Vasiliya Ioannovicha. Chast’ 1-aya (gody s 1474 po 1505) [Monumants of diplomatic relations of the Moscow state with Asian peoples: the Crimea, Kazakn, Nogays and Turkey during the reign of Grand Princes Ivan III and Basiliy III. Pt. 1 (1474–1505)] Sbornik Imperatorskogo Russkogo istoricheskogo obshchestva [Collection of the Imperial Russian Historical Society], 1884, vol. 41. 560 p. (In Russian)
  11. Pochekaev R.Yu. Garantii vladel’cheskikh prav v yarlykakh khanov tyurko-tatarskikh gosudarstv [Legal safeguard for the rights of property in the yarliks of khans of Turkic-Tatar states]. In: Sistema zemlevladeniya i sotsial’nye kategorii naseleniya Volgo-Ural’ya i Zapadnoy Sibiri XVI–XIX vv. [Landed property system and social categories of population of Volga-Ural region and Western Siberia, 16th–19th cc.], iss. 1. Kazan: Sh. Marjani Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2021, pp. 9–25. (In Russian)
  12. Pochekaev R.Yu. Pravovaya kul’tura Zolotoy Ordy (istoriko-pravovye ocherki) [Legal culture of the Golden Horde (historical legal essays)]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ., 2015. 312 p. (In Russian)
  13. Pochekaev R.Yu. Ekonomicheskie sanktsii Rossiyskoy imperii protiv Khivinskogo khanstva v XVIII i XIX vv.: prichiny, pravovoe oformlenie, effektivnost’ [Economic sanctions of the Russian Empire against the Khanate of Khiva in 18th and 19th cc.]. Voprosy pravovedeniya [Questions of jurisprudence], 2016, no. 3, pp. 200–215. (In Russian)
  14. Radlov V. Yarlyki Tokhtamysha i Temir-Kutluka [Yarlighs of Toqtamysh and Timur-Kutluq]. Zapiski Vostochnogo otdeleniya Imperatorskogo Russkogo arkheologicheskogo obshchestva [Proceedings of the Oriental branch of the Imperial Russian Archeological Society], 1889, vol. 3. (Imprint). 40 p. (In Russian)
  15. Smirnov V.D. Krymskoe khanstvo pod verkhovenstvom Ottomanskoy porty do nachala XVIII v. [Crimean Khanate under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Porte until the beginning of the 18th c.]. Moscow: Rubezhi XXI Publ., 2005. 544 p. (In Russian)
  16. Sultanov T.I. Pis’ma zolotoordynskikh khanov [Letters of the Golden Horde khans]. Tyurkologicheskiy sbornik [Turkic Studies Collection], 1975, pp. 234–251. (In Russian)
  17. Sultanov T.I. Pis’mo zolotoordynskogo khana Ulug-Mukhammeda turetskomu sultanu Muradu II [ A Letter of the Golden Horde khan Ulug-Muhammad to Turkish sultan Murad II]. Tyurkologicheskiy sbornik [Turkic Studies Collection], 1973, pp. 53–61. (In Russian)
  18. Faizov S.F. Pis’ma khanov Islam-Gireya III i Mukhammed-Gireya IV k tsaryu Alekseyu Mikhaylovichu i korolyu Yanu Kazimiru. 1654–1658 [Letter of the Crimean khans Islam-Giray III and Muhammad-Giray IV to tzar Alexey Mikhailovich and king John-Kazimir, 1654–1658]. Moscow: Gumanitariy Publ., 2003. 168 p. (In Russian)
  19. Khautala R. V zemlyakh «Severnoy Tartarii»: Svedeniya latinskikh istochnikov o Zolotoy Orde v pravlenie khana Uzbeka (1313–1341) [In the lands of the “Northern Tartaria”: Information of Latin sources on the Golden Horde during the reign of khan Uzbek (1313–1341)]. Kazan: Sh. Marjani Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, 2019, 976 p. (In Latin, Russian)
  20. Khoroshkevich A.L. Rus’ i Krym: Ot soyuza k protivostoyaniyu. Konets XV – nachalo XVI vv. [Russia and the Crimea: From alliance to confrontation. End of 15th – beginning of 16th cc.]. Moscow: URSS Publ., 2001. 336 p. (In Russian)
  21. Allsen T.T. Mongolian Princes and Their Merchant Partners, 1200–1260. Asia Major, ser. 3, 1989, vol. 2, pt. 2, pp. 83–126.
  22. Endicott-West E. Merchant Associations in Yuan China: The Ortoy. Asia Major, ser. 3, 1989, vol. 2, pt. 2, pp. 127–156.
  23. Kolodziejczyk D. The Crimean Khanate and Poland-Lithuania: International Diplomacy on the European Periphery (15th–18th Century). A Study of Peace Treaties Followed by Annotated Documents. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2011. XXXVI+1049 p.
  24. Kowalski T., Dutkewicz J. Jarlyk tatarski z r. 1177 [Tatar yarliks of 1177]. Rocznik orientalistyczny, 1925, vol. 2, pp. 213–219. (In Polish)
  25. Melek Özyetgin A. On the Term Ortuq (~ Ortaq) “Merchant” among the Old Turks.International Journal of Central Asiatic Studies, 2007, vol. 11–1, pp. 1–17.
  26. Pochekaev R.Yu. Tamgha and the struggle against it: on the history of medieval Turkic-Mongol taxation system. Golden Horde Review, 2014, no. 4(6), pp. 77–95.

About the author: Roman Yu. Pochekaev – Dr. Sci. (History), Cand. Sci. (Jurisprudence), Associate professor, Professor, Head of the Department of theory and history of law and state, National Research University Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg; Senior Researcher of “The Great Altai” Scientific Educational Center of altaistics and turkology (198099, Promyshlennaya Str., 17, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation); rpochekaev@hse.ru

×Close search
Search